The
figure of the inventor, mad or otherwise, is quite common in pulp science
fiction of the early twentieth century. Inevitably
his creations are examples of unrestrained hubris and egoism, and achieve
spectacular, if ironic consequences. (Her inventions on the other hand, had
they received the attention due them and been documented with as much care,
almost certainly would have been more sensible, more helpful to the
commonweal.) There are numerous examples
of this stock character.
Dr.
Strange makes evil use of a device that combines hypnotism and radio waves in
Hugh B. Cave’s The Murder Machine
(1930). Dr. Pollard develops technology
that focuses cosmic rays and accelerates human evolution in Edmond Hamilton’s The Man Who Evolved (1931). In another story by Hamilton, Dr. Detmold
creates an artificial intelligence capable of reproducing itself. It later marshals a giant robot army with
which it attacks the eastern United States in the H.G. Wells inspired The Metal Giants (1926).
More
poignantly, a bereaved scientist develops technology by which he hopes to communicate
with his deceased wife. He nearly
destroys the world in William Sloane’s marvelous The Edge of Running Water (1936), which is several cuts above the
science fiction typical of the period.
(This novel is actually one of two recently published as The Rim of Morning just last year.)
Like
Sloane, David H. Keller’s work in this subgenre is markedly different from the
usual fare. Keller was an older
contemporary of H.P. Lovecraft’s, about 10 years his senior. He was a psychiatrist before he turned to
writing as a second career later in life.
This occupational background is reflected in his convincing portrayals
of characters and their reactions to unusual circumstances. Whereas Lovecraft tended to write himself in as the protagonist of most of
his stories, Keller wrote about other people who may have been versions of some
of the patients he knew.
The Flying Fool (1929) is about an inventor,
though this one does more assembling than outright invention. Unlike the protagonists in the afore-mentioned stories, Robert
Smith is not a scientist, nor particularly deranged. He is unhappy and restless, however. He wants something better in life—he literally
wants to rise above his work-a-day world as a department store clerk, and the
contraption he builds is an obvious metaphor for economic transcendence.
The Flying Fool is in a collection published by
Arkham House in 1952, Tales from
Underwood. The stories in the book
are divided into sections reflecting Keller’s three broad areas of
interest: “the science-fictioneer”, “the
fantaisiste” and “the psychiatrist”.
Most of his work originally appeared in Amazing Stories and in Weird
Tales.
The
setting of Keller’s story is New York City at the beginning of the Great
Depression. The poverty of the lead
character and his wife—symbolized by her endless darning of socks that cannot
be replaced with new ones—empowers the theme of the story: the ruination of hopes and ambitions by a
faltering economy that cannot support them.
Money is scarce, and its lack is the impetus for the main character, the
amateur inventor Robert Smith, to explore various money-making schemes. One of these involves developing a
technological means for individuals to fly.
The Flying Fool (1929) begins as many stories of
this type do, with a smattering of half-baked scientific theory:
Many
centuries ago man realized that light and heat were related. Then Joule and Rumford showed that light, heat,
and energy were related according to definite physical laws. Thus, energy was added to light and
heat. Now, gradually the scientists have
proven that to these three forces can be added matter, space, time,
gravitation, and electricity. The only
factor absent was to determine the relation between electricity and
gravitation. According to Einstein, [a
frequently cited authority by pulp science fiction inventors—editor.], there is
only one substance, ‘the field’, and this contains electrical and gravitational
components which are closely tied together by a single formula…
It is a
short leap from here to conceive of a device that operates through a
combination of electricity, magnetism and a unique substance called “permalloy”. Permalloy, recently invented, is strongly
repelled by magnetic fields. Conveniently,
Smith learns that the Bell Telephone Laboratories nearby has some permalloy for
sale, at ten dollars per pound. This is a
small fortune for the inventor, but the material is critical for Smith’s
experiments. He sews it into the fabric of his suit—surely a tangible
expression of his desire to move upward in the world.
(“Permalloy”
may remind older readers of “Upsadasium”, featured in numerous episodes of Rocky and His Friends. These aired in 1960 through 1961. Bullwinkle’s uncle owns an upsadasium mine,
and Rocky and his associates struggle to safeguard the anti-gravity material
for the United States government, keeping it out of the hands of Boris and
Natasha and the evil Pottsylvanian leader, Mr. Big.)
As he
nears the completion of his invention, Smith has to solve various technical
problems: how to keep the unit stable in
flight, how to propel it horizontally, how ensure there is a safe amount of power
to prevent him from plummeting back to earth like Icarus. Keller weaves in some irony here, for the various
innovations Smith makes on the way to mastering flight technology would have
been money makers in themselves:
And
right there Robert Smith hovered on the edge of becoming a
multimillionaire. Had he patented that
little idea and protected the patent, his wife would have had no more need to
darn sox, but all he could think of at that time was going up in the air.
In the
climactic scene, he sits in his specially designed electromagnetic chair on the
balcony, about to throw the switch for the first trial run. But from the interior of his cramped
apartment he hears his two year old daughter begin to stir and cry in her sleep…
The Flying Fool is not as psychologically
disturbing as Keller’s The Worm
(1927) or The Thing in the Cellar
(1932), nor as edgy as The Doorbell
(1934). The overall tone of this
invention story is one of affection, sadness and irony. Robert Smith will not be able to transcend
his circumstances, even with a permalloy powered flying device. It seems he would have achieved the same
negative results if he had pursued door-to-door sales, taken a correspondence course,
or engaged in some other get rich quick scheme. Keller is describing a character type, or
perhaps a character situation, one that is still very familiar to us
today. In hard times, what can an
average Joe or Josephine do to overcome their economic fate?
Which
brings to mind an individual of roughly the same time period—late 1920s to the
mid 1930s—who was also unable to escape impoverishment despite grand ambitions. H.P. Lovecraft subsisted for a couple decades
on the dwindling estate of his deceased grandfather, and experienced only
minimal success as an author during his lifetime. It is remarkable, given his materialist bent
and enthusiasm for science, that his fiction is almost completely devoid of
inventions, technology, or scientists.
There
were of course studious, antiquarian investigators poring over obscure tattered
documents and connecting the dots. In
Lovecraft’s work there are numerous sorcerers, scholars and occultists, but almost no
one wielding experimental gadgetry or applying the scientific method. Scientists do begin to appear in his later work,
for example At the Mountains of Madness (1936). There is considerable evidence that Lovecraft
was aware of contemporary advances in scientific knowledge and technology. “Riemannian equations” and “the whole
Einsteinian space-time continuum” appear in The
Dreams in the Witch-House (1933). An
adapted Crookes tube is used as weapon in The
Shunned House (1928).
But for
one reason or other Lovecraft never completely made the transition to science
fiction, was never able to transcend or rise above horror. In fact, he barely rose above ground level, literally speaking, much
less achieved flight. “Who can, with my
knowledge, think of the earth’s unknown caverns without a nightmare dread of
future possibilities?” Though he surely
did not seek salvation in religion, it seems he did not think scientific
invention would provide much hope of deliverance, either for his characters, or himself.
********************
George
Allan England, author of the frequently anthologized The Thing From Outside (1923) has some amusing advice for aspiring
science fiction writers, circa 1924.
Much of it is focused on stories involving scientific inventions. See If
You’d Rather Write Pulp Fiction…
Several
earlier posts have discussed pulp science fiction stories featuring
weird inventions:
Technology
and Timeframes in Weird Menace Fiction (Hugh B. Cave’s The Murder Machine)
Our
Cerebral Future (Edmond Hamilton’s The
Man Who Evolved)
1. Robots
Run Amok (Edmond Hamilton’s The Metal
Giants)
2.
Mad Scientist, Mad Gardener (R.G.
Macready’s The Plant Thing)
Clues
at the Scene of the Slime (Anthony M. Rud’s Ooze)
Necromantic
Epiphenomena (William Sloane’s The
Edge of Running Water)
Don’t
Look Now, But… (Frances Steven’s Unseen—Unfeared
and H.P. Lovecraft’s From Beyond)
I really must read Keller. Lovecraft's position is interesting, especially since he knew of Carnacki, Hodgson's creation, but was very dismissive of the Ghost Finder. Carnacki, of course, was scientific and meticulous, and those stories introduced such devices as his electric pentacle.The science-based approach was obviously not to HPL's taste, except in passing. Incidentally, I referenced your Smeltzer interview last week on greydogtales. Hope that is OK (I did link back, naturally).
ReplyDeleteI saw the reference and appreciated it--thanks.
ReplyDeleteKeller is interesting because of the way he applies his psychiatric experience to characterization. With the exception of Stanley G. Weinbaum and a very few others, many pulp writers, Lovecraft included, did not display much knowledge of human nature in their characters, much less a familiarity with women. Which is why authors like Smeltzer and his contemporaries are interesting to watch, as they combine Lovecraftian motifs with a more balanced and modern view of gender and ethnicity.
Quite agree (although it's years since I read Weinbaum). When the Cthulhusattva anthology is out in May, I could send you the text of my 'Messages' story for amusement, if you'd like. Lovecraft from the angle of a mother and her daughter in present-day Anchorage. The next author I want to cover, if I get time, is H R Wakefield, who has a better understanding of human nature, but who seems almost misogynist at times.
DeletePlease do--I'd be interested in taking a look at it.
ReplyDeleteKeller was IMO the most interesting of the SF writers writing for the pulps from 1928 to 1933, before Stanley Weinbaum appeared as a super nova in 1934.
ReplyDeleteBTW, Permalloy is, despite the "scientifictious" name, a real alloy that was invented in 1914.
Thanks for this info!
ReplyDelete