By now,
many readers have encountered reams of analysis and bloviation, much of it
apocalyptic, about the departure of Britain from the European Union. The matter is serious, insofar as the Brexit
foreshadows the further unravelling of the E.U.
There is talk of an impending Frexit and Nexit—and closer to home, even
a Texit. The rapid disintegration of the status quo in
politics, economics and other venues is upsetting, the stuff of nightmares. Yet this is what seems to be happening around
the world right now—certainly in the U.S.A.
Where
can fans of old school horror, science fiction and fantasy turn for guidance
and reassurance in these troubling times?
Does H.P. Lovecraft have any insights to offer about contemporary
challenges in international politics? Of course he does.
But his
observations are disquieting—and offer cold comfort. Lovecraft had much to say
about the world politics of his time, and gave considerable thought to what he
considered to be the ideal form of government.
To be fair, his views changed over time, away from “…my ideal of a
government fitted to the machine age is a fascistic one…” to a more nuanced
version of universal socialism. (He
outlines his proposal for a fascist industrial state in a letter to Robert E.
Howard dated November 7, 1932.)
The
impact of immigration was also a concern of Lovecraft’s. This had been an important issue throughout
the 1920s and 1930s, a source of considerable social unrest, as it is now. His notoriously reactionary and xenophobic views
about race and ethnicity were expressed in both his fiction and his correspondence—and
shared by his contemporaries. His views
in this area did not change much over the course of his lifetime.
Many of
Lovecraft’s political and sociological ideas were expressed in correspondence to
people like Elizabeth Toldridge, J. Vernon Shea, (especially) and Robert E.
Howard, among others, in the early 1930s.
Lovecraft also outlined some of his ideas about future government in “The
Mound”, a marvelous collaboration with Zealia Bishop that he co-wrote around
this time. In terms of historical
context, 1932 and 1933 saw the ongoing invasion of Manchuria by Japan as well
as the rise of the Nazis to power in Germany—the prelude to the Second World
War. Anxiety about world events and the
possibility of war were aggravated further by the economic turmoil and devastation
of the Great Depression. Comparisons to
our own time are unavoidable.
In a
letter to Elizabeth Toldridge from January of 1932, Lovecraft offers a general
theory of the fate of civilizations, which he based in part on his knowledge of
ancient Greek and Roman history. This was
prompted by a number of disturbing world events occurring at the time.
As
for current political & social change—I don’t believe the present
tendencies indicate any more than closely analytical people, (which of course,
excludes superficial business men & bombastic politicians) have always
expected since the wide application of machinery to industry and transportation…Moreover,
all cultures perish sooner or later through sheer collective senility—& the
more dynamic they are, the quicker they go…What is happening today is simply a
necessary readjustment to institutions to fit a radically different set of
actual living & working conditions & a tremendously enlarged field of
knowledge…
In
another letter to Toldridge, sent the following month, Lovecraft speculates
about the advantages of war with Japan, which at that time was busy developing
its empire in the Pacific. He lists the
traditional benefits of war: “…the stimulus to munition & other industries
& the disposal of surplus population—& also, because such a war will
probably be necessary in any case sooner or later in order to ensure
Anglo-Saxon security in the Pacific.”
But he makes a more provocative point later on in the same letter about
race, culture and civilization, one that is worth pondering today as we collectively
oscillate between an uneasy globalism on the one hand and a virulent tribalism
on the other:
In
my opinion the paramount things of existence are those mental & imaginative
landmarks—language, culture, traditions, perspectives, instinctive responses to
environmental stimuli, &c.—which give to mankind the illusion of
significance & direction in the cosmic drift. Race and civilisation are more important,
according to this point of view, than concrete political or economic status; so
that the weakening of any racial culture by political division is to be
regarded as an unqualified evil—justifiable only by the most extreme
provocation.
Lovecraft’s
letters to J. Vernon Shea in early 1932 are fairly militaristic in tone. He indicates that war with Japan may be
inevitable and “highly necessary” to preserve Anglo-Saxon interests. “Pacifistic talk is merely evasion &
idealistic hot air—”, he says, but acknowledges the value of treaty agreements
to control minor disputes. His view is
fatalistic: “There will always be wars,
& the victors in them will always be those with the greatest wealth, man-power,
stamina, & intelligent preparation.”
In a later letter to Shea he opines:
I’m
not denying the extreme ill effects of modern warfare, or even that a future
world war may mean the end of civilisation; but in spite of all that I can’t
blind myself to the plain & simple fact that war is no more avoidable than
earthquakes or cyclones…War is no formal institution which legislation can
abolish. It is simply the inevitable
result of basic human instincts under certain recurrent & unavoidable
conditions…No diversity of groups can
ever be depended upon to act permanently & reliably together—& despite
all the pretence and hokum there is no indication of any real trend in this direction. Radically different interests & heritages
make such a collective policy virtually impossible for all time—& he who
banks on such a thing gets woefully left...[Emphasis mine, vis-á-vis the apparent
fragility of the European Union.]
In
another letter to J. Vernon Shea, this one sent in March of 1932, Lovecraft
advocates for universal military training, citing the disorganization and lack
of preparation of the U.S. military at the beginning of the First World War. It seems he is arguing for a stronger
national defense as a hedge against likely hostility. “Suppose that emergency had been a sudden
Japanese-Mexican invasion, (as we may have some day), instead of a distant
conflict with allies already holding the enemy at bay.” Oh my.
Most
ominous in this pre-World War II correspondence of Lovecraft’s are his infamous
comments about Adolph Hitler, which he wrote in a letter to Shea, dated May 29,
1933:
As
for the Nazis—of their crudeness there can be no dispute, yet in many ways the
impartial analyst cannot help having a certain sympathy for some phases of
their position. They are fighting, in
their naïve & narrow way, a certain widespread & insidious mood of recent years which certainly
spells potential decadence for the western world—& one can’t help
respecting that intention, however ugly & even dangerous some of their methods may appear to be. Hitler is no Mussolini—but I’m damned if the
poor chap isn’t profoundly sincere & patriotic.
That a
thoughtful and insightful writer like Lovecraft could be attracted to fascism
is appalling, if only because we of the twenty-first century are eager to
distance ourselves from his world view.
It would be more comforting if his social and political opinions, which he
shared with many of his contemporaries, could be stored as dead dry relics in
some museum case, safe and inert. But
his words sound very familiar—in fact we’ve heard something like them spoken
again in the past few weeks. Whatever
becomes of the European Union—or the American presidential election for that
matter—current events are eerily similar to those Lovecraft wrote about less
than a century ago.